• marcos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      58
      arrow-down
      22
      ·
      8 months ago

      Gotta stop pretending “left” and “right” are useful labels to apply to politics too.

      • 9point6@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        They aren’t useless, but they are pretty broad strokes that will always have a use as long as we’re talking about any de facto two party states (e.g. those with FPTP voting systems).

        It’s also worth remembering that the population of one country’s idea of left wing politicians might actually end up being right wing elsewhere (for instance, people in the US saying their democratic party are lefty when in most of Europe they would be considered center-right or just plain right-wing).

        • Prunebutt@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          That’s not what makes the terms useful.

          US Democrats aren’t left and the term is still useful in European politics.

          • 9point6@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            8 months ago

            I’m not really saying what makes them useful, that’s a long list. I was more going for saying they’re not useless, but are potentially pretty ambiguous without additional context due to how people use them.

      • Prunebutt@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 months ago

        Please elaborate how “equality” and “hierarchy” based policies aren’t useful labels for politics anymore.

      • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        I’ve always liked a 2 axis spectrum. Social ownership/ private ownership on one axis. Authoritarian / libertarian on the other.

      • unalivejoy@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        8 months ago

        Especially “horseshoe” politics. Leftist just means centrist.

      • Zagorath@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        The irony is that the only Lemmy instances blocked in China are the tanky ones.

    • PatFusty@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      This comment doesnt make sense. I think its time for you guys to brush up on the difference between leftist and liberal left. CCP and leftist have the same agenda.

      • ImFresh3x@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        China is a corporatist authoritarian state. Basically late stage capitalism with a bunch of steps skipped. Corporations married to the government. Where the right wing in America is headed.

    • ITALIEN@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      20
      ·
      8 months ago

      Being new to Lemmy I’m very taken back by the amount of communist supporters everywhere. Where my capitalist bros at?

      • Mr Fish@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        8 months ago

        Lemmy is a community hosted system, and a lot of the user base came here after leaving other platforms (mostly reddit) because of the owners making it worse and worse trying to copy other platforms like tiktok.

        And you’re wondering why everyone here has problems with capitalism.

        That’s not even mentioning the other huge problems with capitalism.

        • ITALIEN@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          8 months ago

          What?

          FOSS is great, I like the idea of people from all over the world contributing towards software that benefits the user rather than the creator.

          I fail to see how that equates to “communism good” though. That’s a huge leap in thinking. Really weird when surely most people on here live and benefit from capitalist societies.

          • Mr Fish@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            I fail to see how that equates to “communism good” though.

            The problem is that very few people make the decisions that impact everyone on the platform, which ends up meaning “capitalism bad”. Fixing that problem with a system that’s basically owned by users is sort of like making the system communist.

            surely most people on here live and benefit from capitalist societies.

            Sure, they live in capitalist societies, but do they honestly benefit from it being capitalist more than they would from it being communist or socialist? Are they really better off in a system that inherently increases inequality rather than decreasing it?

          • xor@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            “you say capitalism but yet you live under capitalism, checkmate” doesn’t really work, because you don’t just get to choose the economic system you live in

            Sure, capitalism has brought significant improvements to quality of life, but given that the systems that preceded it were largely feudalism and subsistence farming, that’s not really a high bar.

            And it certainly doesn’t mean that we shouldn’t continue to develop economic and social systems that are even more equitable.

      • TORFdot0@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        I’ve put some thought into how to respond to this but I just can’t get past “capitalism bros” so I’ll just say this, you can criticize the current market economy system most of the west has without being a full on communist. And those that are content with capitalism aren’t going to go out of their way to be a “capitalism bro”. So of course dissenting voices to the current status quo are going to be amplified here. Try to learn from others perspectives instead of seeking validation

        • ITALIEN@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          I meant that light heatedly but I see how that could come across as an immature comment. I guess where I’m coming from and failed to articulate in a constructive way is that I’m surprised there’s so much support for communism when likely most of the people on here live in capitalist societies that though have issues still allow them enough freedom to make those statements without fear of punishment.

      • lugal@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        You’re not even federated with the tanky instances…

        I give you a hint: lemmy is a decentralized, non commercial platform. The cap*talists are still on r*ddit

  • Fades@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    111
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    There is no “lemmy”, every instance is unique. Just don’t waste your time with the fascist instances

    • TangledHyphae@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      Do you have any recommendations on finding more centrist lemmy instances? Because there is an extreme left and right which seems clear amongst quite a few instances and I don’t want to be a part of any of them.

      • jaybone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        I’ve never seen a right wing instance. I guess they are not federated with Lemmy.world

        • TangledHyphae@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          That appears to be what’s happening. I think at this point I should probably set up my own instance to federate multiple sources and not be stuck with one specific content filter. Not right-wing at all (truthsocial already contains most of those… people, hard pass), just more a mix of everything.

      • chakan2@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        Centrist views are shunned by the internet at large. Both sides hate us.

        • gkd@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          Because a large number of people on boards like Reddit or Twitter who call themselves centrists use “I’m not a republican” as some way to excuse bigoted views on race, LGBT issues, etc. I suppose the opposite may be true if you’re in a right-leaning place and have left-leaning views, although I wouldn’t know.

          While that might not be the view of centrists in general, that’s the perception of the “centrist” on the internet, and why people generally don’t like them.

  • Aria@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    99
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    8 months ago

    I checked and you weren’t banned for mentioning Tienanmen square, no one cared. You were temp banned (30 days) for using racist language, holocaust denial, and promoting the Uigur concentration camp conspiracy theory and lying about what your sources are.

    • flamingos-cant@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Where did they deny the Holocaust? The comment that got removed for ‘spreading nazi misinfo’ seems to be them calling the modern Russian and Chinese states dictatorships that are engaging in genocide.

    • Justfollowingorders1@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      Whoaaaa. Wait, do people on Lemmy think Ugiar thing is a conspiracy? That’s like election result denial level of brain wash

      • GarbageShoot [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Would you be surprised to find out there weren’t WMDs either? If you want an extensive set of answers, I’d recommend using the search feature, but secondarily there are many different “askX” comms to source it from

      • brain_in_a_box [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        If you’re so knowledgeable about the situation that you can be so certain that it’s happening that you consider doubt invalid, why don’t you know how to spell Uyghur?

      • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        Palestine and Yemen don’t believe it either, after sending delegations. You know, two Muslim majority countries that are experiencing genocide.

    • MuuuaadDib@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      You have access to Reddit backend? I am curious if you can see why I was banned, as I have an idea but they deleted my comment and said I was banned from it /r/MuuaadDib is my account. Just curious, if not no big I was on there for a long time to be banned for such a silly reason. Cheers! To be honest this smaller community seems a little better thus far.

    • Starshader@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      8 months ago

      Nope. It was about mocking the Chinease president, saying that Russia and China were dictatorships and yes calling the Uigur genocide, without denying any other genocides… you’re the one that deny it and lying like a politician or a government drone. You don’t have any idea what my sources are. That’s pathetic…

      • Sunforged@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        8 months ago

        You going to provide any sources? Are those sources going to be tied to Adrian Zenz?

          • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            30
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            8 months ago

            So… relying on Zenz, RFA, or Amnesty international, known for the famous “saddam is killing babies in incubators” lie to support a US campaign of genocide.

            Huh.

            Can you find any reports of an increase in terrorism in the area? Groups being discriminated against so heavily will always resort to violent self defense.

            Can you find any reports of mass refugees? Groups being targeted by genocide always try to flee to other places where they won’t be targeted.

            • Starshader@lemmy.mlOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              8 months ago

              Oh Okay sorry China is a country ruled by nice friendly people that loves freedom of speech, culture, people. You should go live there. Also Putin is as nice as a koala and just want to save babies. You can go back to sleep. Thank you for enlighting me.

              • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                23
                arrow-down
                7
                ·
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                You know, China can have problems without being comically evil, right?

                I have friends who immigrated from China or live here part time, it is just a normal country. Maybe free-er and more democratic in some ways than here, and worse in some other aspects.

            • Justfollowingorders1@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              8 months ago

              This is literally Trump level denial. Don’t like the truth, deny the validity of the sources.

              Boo. I thought lemmt was better than this. Can’t be surprised we got Xi dick suckers on here tho given the demo.

              • Diva (she/her)@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                18
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                ✅ casual homophobia

                ✅ owns a gender-affirming vehicle

                ✅ accusing other people of being like Trump

                ✅ ‘canadian’

                to be frank I don’t really trust your ability to assess the truth of anything

              • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                14
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                8 months ago

                Can you find any reports of an increase in terrorism in the area? Groups being discriminated against so heavily will always resort to violent self defense.

                Can you find any reports of mass refugees? Groups being targeted by genocide always try to flee to other places where they won’t be targeted.

    • tacosanonymous@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      50
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      If they told the truth, how could they make a post about being a victim of the evil “lefties?”

      • Lath@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        50
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        8 months ago

        Question: How is a “xinnie the poo” joke racist when it refers to one individual specifically?
        Has it already advanced to be used against all chinese?

        • Neato@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          8 months ago

          It isn’t. It’s not saying Chinese people look like Winnie the Pooh. Or even than he looks like Winnie because he’s Chinese or asian. It’s just a coincidental resemblance. And people wouldn’t use it as a pseudo-insult if it didn’t upset him so much. Which is kind of baffling why anyone would be upset at that comparison; it makes you seem lovable.

          • porcupine@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            8 months ago

            Have some perspective my dude: nobody saying this shit on the internet in English is doing it because it “upsets him”. Xi Jinping isn’t reading this. You are not in communication with him. He doesn’t know who you are. White anglos say it to each other because it makes them feel good to have a license to make racist jokes in a context where their peers won’t shame them for it.

            • Neato@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              Is it racist? Or is it mocking someone among others and delighting in the known fact that it makes a deplorable person upset? Same thing with mocking Trump for small hands.

              Also, it doesn’t seem like it originates from racism: https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/xi-jinping-winnie-the-pooh-comparisons

              I don’t hang around in racist circles, but I’ve never seen it used in what others have said below. Have you seen it used that way commonly?

              • porcupine@lemmygrad.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                8 months ago

                Yes I’ve seen it used that way commonly. I’m seeing it used that way commonly right now. The “joke” originates from a picture of Xi Jinping and Barack Obama in which the Asian man is compared to a yellow bear, and the black man is compared to an African cat named “Tigger”. If you saw people calling Obama “Tigger” (or “a tigger”, so be a bit less subtle about it) as an epithet, I seriously doubt you’d be willing to accept claims of ignorance, or that “catch a tiger by the toe, if he hollers let him go” is just a harmless phrase that people say because it “upsets” him in a totally race neutral way.

                I’m glad you mentioned the Trump hands thing too, because while there’s not an analogous racial component, you make the joke for the same reason: it’s not to “upset Trump”, who absolutely doesn’t know you exist and is totally unaffected by anything you personally say or do. You do it to identify yourself to other American liberals as a consumer of John Oliver or Stephen Colbert’s TV shows. I think it’s petty and stupid to substitute fandom for politics, but at the end of the day, correcting you on that isn’t terribly important to me. Trump is a white American whose deliberate actions have made life materially worse for most people I personally know, and who has no shortage of public statements that are repugnant on their face. The entire US political and economic system exists to protect him and people like him.

                Why do I give a shit what petty superficial shit you say about Xi then? I promise it’s not for his benefit. I don’t know the guy, and crucially, I don’t think you do either. I believe that you hate him, but I don’t believe it’s for anything specific that he personally said or did. I’m no expert, but by all accounts he seems to be a pretty boring guy that says pretty normal generic shit about development, stability, and cooperation. I’m willing to bet you don’t speak Chinese, or have some terribly deep personal connection to China, so I’m also willing to bet he only exists for you as a vague symbol of “badness” constructed through your consumption of English language capitalist media. Media produced by Euro-American companies with a direct financial stake in manufacturing consent for a war against China. I think if Xi were replaced tomorrow with a literal mannequin, you’d still believe you had good reasons for hating that mannequin. The reason I wasted my time typing all this isn’t because I believe Xi needs to be protected from you (maliciously or not) making racist jokes on the internet. It’s because I would really prefer it if English speaking people that probably believe themselves to be kind and good and caring didn’t invest their time and effort and energy into dehumanizing and othering one of the most populous nations on earth toward the end of justifying a nuclear war that will probably end human life on earth. There are simply less destructive ways to get your lulz online.

                • Neato@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  8 months ago

                  Barack Obama in which the Asian man is compared to a yellow bear, and the black man is compared to an African cat named “Tigger”. If you saw people calling Obama “Tigger” (or “a tigger”, so be a bit less subtle about it) as an epithet, I seriously doubt you’d be willing to accept claims of ignorance,

                  Wait, what? Tigers are not native to Africa. They are an Asian cat.

                  You do it to identify yourself to other American liberals as a consumer of John Oliver or Stephen Colbert’s TV shows. I think it’s petty and stupid to substitute fandom for politics, but at the end of the day, correcting you on that isn’t terribly important to me

                  And yet you still do it.

                  I’m no expert, but by all accounts he seems to be a pretty boring guy that says pretty normal generic shit about development, stability, and cooperation.

                  He can be the nicest dude ever but he leads a control with an iron-grip on speech and media consumption, which is anathema to most english-speaking countries. Also you know, the genocide.

                  constructed through your consumption of English language capitalist media.

                  Aaaaand there we go. Tankie talking points.

                  toward the end of justifying a nuclear war

                  Scare tactics! If you knew the first thing of geopolitics, you’d know this would never, ever happen. If russia isn’t going to lob nukes when it’s getting its ass handed to it, China won’t have a reason to.

                  This whole little diatribe is full of inaccuracies, huge ass-pulls and insinuations that are so wild as to be ridiculous. And as soon as you actually get a little specific, you throw your entire argument away.

        • porcupine@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          13
          ·
          8 months ago

          Are you really asking why it’s racist for white settlers to call the Chinese head of state a yellow animal? Do you think it wasn’t racially motivated when people made similar “jokes” about Barack Obama because they “just referred to one individual specifically”?

          • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            14
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            white settlers

            whut

            Also I thought the joke originated from China

          • Kalinus@lemmings.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Ok, I never thought about the “yellow animal” angle, so thanks for bringing that up. I just always assumed he didn’t like the comparison because it was like insisting he was short and fat and since he didn’t like it, everyone sorta just ran with it as an insult. Meanwhile I was thinking “who the hell doesn’t like Winnie the Pooh? He shoulda embraced the comparison”

            So yea, thanks for the extra info.

            • Lath@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              8 months ago

              I’d say regular people in general don’t think that deeply about these things.
              And though the skin theory sounds correct, i still think it’s about the short and fat part more. It affected his dignity and image, and as i understand it, the concept of ‘giving face’ is of great importance in chinese culture.

          • Rolder@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            White settlers? Some brief searching tells me the origin was from Indian social media and then taken for use by Chinese citizens who disagree with him.

          • Lath@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            8 months ago

            So in the same vein, all those monkey caricatures of Putin are also racist as well then.

            • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              8 months ago

              I mean yeah, depicting people as monkeys is generally rooted pretty explicitly in racism, and even white eastern europeans have been subject to racism from western Europe. Read what Emma Goldman wrote about that “conniving slanty eyed Asian”(paraphrased) Stalin.

              • pingveno@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                When have racist depictions of Eastern Europeans as monkeys been a thing?

          • GBU_28@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            8 months ago

            In the origin of the meme, by your logic, Obama was compared to a tiger.

            Is Obama orange and striped with a white belly?

              • Krauerking@lemy.lol
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                7
                ·
                8 months ago

                LoL that’s such a stretch.
                Plus everyone knows Tiggers are marvelous chaps, and loaded with vim and vigor. Tiggers are wonderful things, and so, hardly an insult.

    • Rolder@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      8 months ago

      Not sure why Winnie the poo is marked as racism when it specifically refers to one person and has nothing to do with that persons race

        • Starshader@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          21
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          8 months ago

          And calling the uhygur genocide bad is spreading nazi disinformation ? Hahahaha

            • Zagorath@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              11
              ·
              8 months ago

              I used to think people talking about “horseshoe theory” were all bullshitters. Because I had never seen people on the left unironically doing anything close to what the right does.

              Then I saw the tankies on Lemmy. I’m still a proud leftist, but geez nothing has made me question that stance more than seeing how fervently the tankies deny genocides and defend aggressive warmongering—as long as the country perpetrating it is one that calls itself “communist”, or is a successor to one that used to call itself communist. Exactly the same way the right and centre-left do regarding Israel’s genocides. Lemmy’s tankies are way more similar to the nazis of other social media than any other group around.

              Which scares me a little as someone who basically completely agrees with them on economic issues.

              • Infamousblt [any]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                24
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                Horseshoe theory only makes sense if you don’t think about it for even one second.

                So, not surprised it makes total sense to you

                • Zagorath@aussie.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  Horseshoe theory doesn’t make sense. That’s the thing.

                  Until suddenly you start seeing people who call themselves leftists denying genocide. Which is something we usually think of as being a quality of the far-right.

                  (The obvious solution here, of course, is that these people who call themselves leftists…aren’t. Because if leftism is about equality, there’s nothing equal about subjecting a people and preventing the continuance of their culture.)

                • Zagorath@aussie.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  There’s a big difference between being upset at some difference in ideology and looking at people sincerely defending or denying a genocide in the name of that ideological difference.

              • Tankiedesantski [he/him]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                14
                ·
                8 months ago

                I’m still a proud leftist, but geez nothing has made me question that stance more than seeing how fervently the tankies deny genocides and defend aggressive warmongering—as long as the country perpetrating it is one that calls itself “communist”, or is a successor to one that used to call itself communist.

                If that were true then we’d all be falling over ourselves to defend Pol Pot instead of calling him a shit and a CIA puppet and not wanting anything to do with him.

              • raven [he/him]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                12
                ·
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                You see that’s kind of where the problem is. You can say there’s a genocide and I can say “where” and that gives me the vibe of a genocide denier. I’ve looked for evidence, I’ve asked for evidence, but the best I’ve ever gotten is a satellite image of some prison in China, some (AI padded) mugshots with no context, and some thorough browbeating by very serious liberals.

                Let me put this another way. I’m of Jewish descent. My great aunt was in a camp. I’m not trying to “deny” any genocides, but what should my standard of evidence be? Particularly when there is a clear incentive for western media to create false narratives about their enemies, and have done so before?

                If you have something to present that I haven’t seen, I and the other “tankies” are wide open to engage with it.

                • Zagorath@aussie.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  You can pretend all you want that you’re “just asking questions”, but that doesn’t change facts. The Uyghur genocide has been very well-established for a long time now.

                  The Chinese propaganda trying to deny their genocide has the same vibes as that time a Chinese official went on a western political current affairs show and said “you have a voting democracy, we have a working democracy”. The fact that Chinese state censorship is so strong (while western media is not censored) means there is very good reason to distrust the reports from Chinese media when they are in disagreement with the majority of reporting from everywhere else. So yeah, I’m going to trust reports from high quality journalistic organisations like the ABC, rather than anything that’s allowed to be reported on publicly within China.

                  The irony here, of course, is that even if you take the Chinese party line at its word. That its actions are nothing more than heavily policing an area where there are dangerous terrorists and separatist. That’s pretty much exactly the same as the Israeli line. It boggles my mind that people can call out one but not the other. It’s not surprising for me that the right does it. There’s an element of racism there, and chauvinism for defending their political allies. And I’ll be honest, I’ve always associated the right with a denial of facts. But the fact that people who have the gall to call themselves leftists will pretend there’s nothing wrong is

              • axont [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                12
                ·
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                Ok, the Khmer Rouge of Cambodia committed genocide when they were nominally communist at the time. Is that good enough for you? It’s the most noteworthy example I can think of. Actually maybe the Shining Path too, in Peru. I never liked them or their methods.

                The supposed genocide in Xinjiang is not at all the same thing. There’s no open warfare, rebellion, nothing to suggest what western nations are claiming is happening. The only evidence I’ve seen is that prisons exist in Xinjiang, and their prisons are much like prisons anywhere else on the world. All other evidence I’ve seen comes from one specific person, the deluded mind of Adrian Zenz. A man who cannot speak Chinese, has never lived in China, and he’s one guy.

              • HumanBehaviorByBjork [any, undecided]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                10
                ·
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                Hm, so you’re saying that every political faction “denies genocide and defends aggressive warmongering”? Could it perhaps be that every faction gets accused at one point or another of genocide and aggressive warmongering, and it’s your responsibility as a political person to use your brain to figure out who is lying?

                • Zagorath@aussie.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  so you’re saying that every political faction “denies genocide and defends aggressive warmongering”?

                  No. Leftists who aren’t tankies don’t.

            • Starshader@lemmy.mlOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              8 months ago

              Except that I’m a Swiss socialist and that I’m taking my sources from very left wing ONG that I work with ?

              • sharedburdens [she/her, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                16
                ·
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                getting your sources from a “very left wing NGO” how about actual socialists if you’re a ‘socialist.’ I get that you’re Swedish Swiss, we have more people in prison doing forced labor in America than in these ‘genocide camps’ so it’s really hard to take people seriously when they act like ‘genocide’ in China should somehow be at the forefront of what leftists in the west concern themselves with.

          • StellarTabi [she/her]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            26
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            8 months ago

            I’m not going to look up the context, but if you’re randomly shouting “uhygur genocide” in a thread about UN voting to end US embargo on Cuba, US and Israel oppose, that specific type of whataboutism does sound suspicious like parroting nazi disinformation.

          • WhyEssEff [she/her]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            31
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            if i had to guess, probably. it’s somewhat of a plausibly-deniable dogwhistle for ‘asian = yellow’. not saying you meant that, just that I don’t blame the mods for their hypervigilance here

            • Starshader@lemmy.mlOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              11
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              8 months ago

              Oh wow. I honestly didn’t thought about that. I may be an ass sometime but… not like that :o !

              • Zagorath@aussie.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                11
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                8 months ago

                You hadn’t thought of it because it’s completely made up. Xi started getting compared to Winnie the Pooh by Chinese citizens after a picture came out showing Xi and former US President Obama together in a similar pose to Pooh and Tigger. Used originally for rather light-hearted ribbing of Xi, the Chinese government decided to crack down on it hard, which has had a massive Streisand Effect with the comparison between Xi and Pooh becoming popular in the West because Xi has shown how sensitive he is to it.

                There’s no racial component to it at all. It’s all about being critical of the absurd censorship of the current PRC’s government.

                • Garfield@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  26
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  8 months ago

                  i wonder why western redditors found a depiction of an asian president as a fat yellow bear and a black president as a character called Tigger so funny 🤔 definitely no racism here, no sir

                • Bassword [he/him]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  18
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  the Chinese government decided to crack down on it hard

                  Deleting some memes from Weibo isn’t a “hard” crackdown, westerners just want to pretend it is and for some reason still care ten years later.

                • autismdragon [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  17
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  Have you considered that the meme might have different impact coming from a Chinese person ribbing their leader than a white westerner echoing it? The former might be “light ribbing” but the later is racist. Who says a thing matters significantly on whether its ok to say. You know this very well because I’d hope you’d know that its not ok for white people to use the soft r n word even though many black people use it.

                • raven [he/him]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  13
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  There’s no racial component to it at all

                  That’s a pretty bold statement to make. Have you seen the west?

                • Tankiedesantski [he/him]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  12
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  Wow, look at this racism denial from the same person who was criticizing Tankies for genocide denial.

                  “The meme was started by a Chinese person, therefore it can’t be racist” is just a new veneer on “black rappers use the n-word in music, therefore it’s not racist if I use it.”

              • boredtortoise@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                8 months ago

                Yeah, the comments of yours in the modlog are rude but the mod is definitely reaching and banning you for dissent

        • pingveno@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Taken very seriously, and applied very selectively. That mod team loves to put their thumb on the scale.

        • Starshader@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          8 months ago

          So if someone say Christianism sucks because it’s a religion and I respond by saying all religions sucks, is that whataboutism ? Excuse me if I just think that it’s better to criticize everyone than a specific group of person…

          • GarbageShoot [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            8 months ago

            Nations are a sociological formation that objectively exist in the world. Even fucking fascists have better education than you, and not because their education is impressive.

    • abraxas@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      I’ve gotten into arguments in this instance in WorldNews (if I recall) where I strongly disagreed with communists on something. Nobody ever banned me.

      Keep up the good work, mods, and thanks for addressing someone’s ban complaint

    • boredtortoise@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Ah. World news again. The modlog really needs to show which mods are behind the wrong actions. That’s a good screenshot, shitty comments but untrue reasons. Even lemmy code of conduct says that to fix a mod action it should be taken with the mod in question.

  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    8 months ago

    Looking at the modlog (which is public info, you just have to log on to the web ui and scroll down to the bottom).

    3 days ago mod Banned

    @Starshader@lemmy.ml from the community World News@lemmy.ml reason: Racism expires: in 27 days

  • KoboldCoterie@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    8 months ago

    If you’re unhappy with the moderation on a given community, make your own competing community, with your own moderation policies. If more people feel strongly about it and agree with your views over the original, they can come to your community instead. There is no overarching ‘Lemmy’ to ban you; instances are all separate. That’s the beauty of Lemmy.

  • GarbageShoot [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    8 months ago

    I think ultimately your problem is that ideas that were normalized to you on reddit-logo just don’t hold up to scrutiny, and even the academic neoliberal consensus on most of these issues is different from what predditors treat as self-evident. Enculturation is like that, and I wish you a speedy recovery.

  • axont [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    8 months ago

    Every single time I see these complaints about getting banned I look through the modlog and find them saying something racist or transphobic. This isn’t an exception.

    • Ender of Games@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      Yeah… We can look through modlogs and call out your bullshit, too, you know. Calling Xi Jinping Winnie the Pooh isn’t remotely racist nor transphobic. It started in China, from Chinese people, to a Chinese leader. It has nothing to do with race nor sexual orientation, nor is it even remotely close.

      Your stupid accusations make so much sense when I see you are from hexbear, though 😂

  • porcupine@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    8 months ago

    Nobody doing yellow peril shit in English to an audience of Euro-Americans is doing it because they have any genuine principled criticism of Chinese self-governance. If they did, they’d be talking about it to actual Chinese people living in China instead of seeking out other white liberal nationalists to hype each other up about “civilizing the Orientals”.

  • Awoo [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    I’ll ignore the fact that you’re lying about what got you banned for this response.

    Even the western far right media has moved on from the original Tiananmen narrative, which it acknowledges was false. The actual events played out more accurately to exactly what China has always said they were.

    The only people still pushing the original shit are anticommunists and racists because it’s more convenient to their goals to perpetuate it.

    Try actually listening and learning the actual facts from people in the left and then you won’t run into this problem. You’re getting banned and ridiculed by actual leftists because you’re further right and less educated on this topic than the fucking media of far right conservative tories ffs.

    This is what happens when you get your political education from fucking reddit.

    Learn properly: https://archive.ph/24zzF

  • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    8 months ago

    This thread is like half hexbears. I envy all y’all other instances that have thankfully defederated from those nuts.

    • nublug@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      none of their posts make them appear like a reactionary, just this one winnie the pooh thing that only hexbear has decided makes you definitely a right winger.

        • Risk@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          The joke is the dictator man looks like Winnie the Pooh (but more importantly is offended by it). The fact Winnie the Pooh is yellow is incidental but unfortunately makes the joke appetising to racists too. It doesn’t mean everyone that jokes about Xi Jinping being Winnie the Pooh means everyone is using it as a racist stand-in.

          Before someone points out that it started as a racist meme - if that is true (which I have no idea), it doesn’t change much. Most people making the joke are oblivious to the racism element.

          Now, it’s a perfectly valid point to make about it being a racist charicature. The trouble is most people don’t separate the nuance with “Criticise & laugh at the dictator man all you like, just please don’t propogate a racist stereotype.” and so instead it looks like they’re just defending a dictator.

          And… well, I don’t really need to explain why people defending dictators are going to get ignored, do I?

          • Catfish [she/her]@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            8 months ago

            Tell me why he looks like Winnie The Pooh without saying it’s his eyes and skin. It’s entirely impossible to defend the racist caricature because Winnie The Pooh has like 4 distinguishing features and half of them are applied only because the man is Chinese. There are no deep insights to be found in a 2D character. Winnie The Pooh doesn’t have the same amount of forehead wrinkles, he doesn’t have the same curve on his nose, his ears aren’t even similar. So what features of Winnie The Pooh makes you believe he looks like Xi Jinping?

            • Krauerking@lemy.lol
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              Ok, it really sounds like you are stuck in the skin color as an easy way to say it is racist but like… He kinda looks similar

              Like it’s not hard to see where people are pulling it from, sure it’s meant to be inflammatory and hurtful but you have a somewhat heavy set man with big chubby cheeks and tiny lips, a buttony nose that almost looks like Winnie the Pooh’s upside down if it was flesh toned. His pupils are incredibly dark but small giving the same sort of small eyes underneath curving eyebrows.
              And to wrap it all together Xi wears high wasted pants trying to cover his pot belly that almost looks like he is wearing a short shirt that puts it on display. They do look like… Just a little alike. Like Elijah wood and Daniel Radcliffe, they don’t really look alike but also it’s not hard to see why people put the 2 together. Especially with the right photo or look.

              Is it meant to be a bit insulting to compare him to a pantless stuffed bear… Yeah. Duh. But dude Winnie the Pooh is adorable and if he leaned into that he could have been seen as a sweet softie instead of a guy who’s will jail people for saying it.