Anybody have a source on the quote so I can read more about it? (sorry I’m lazy 🥺)
I listened to it here: https://www.youtube.com/live/VdDNCDFpBtA
From about 6:47
it is for them
God I wish they would just be more blunt:
“So according to you, Biden can kill you? If you say yes then hitmen will be on their way”
I’m sure I’ll backfire but god damn it’s annoying when they try to be civil against bad faith actors.
That’s how fascists play the game, they act ridiculous because the other guy cares too much about decorum and being polite to question the absurdity, so they just go along with it.
It’s up to us to be better than them. It’s never been easy, it will be frustrating, but it’s the only way to keep some decency in society.
This has value sometimes. But there are also times where the Democrats take this to an extreme where it borders self-flagellation, rather than a coherent civic value. For example, Republicans in Texas are capable of organizing a parallel military that will challenge the Federal government, and even though the Federal government had the legal right to dismantle it, liberals are far too concerned with appearances to do anything about it. When does this attitude of “decorum above all” end? Before or after fascists begin public lynchings? It’s not an attitude that is applied the same in all directions, either. Why are democrats far more eager to cast doubt into the legitimacy of anti-war protestors than in fighting against fascists challenging the State monopoly of violence?
Yeah, I’m not saying we need to self-flagellate.
It’s just more so I have seen a lot more people on the left getting far too aggressive lately. The amount of people that seem to want violence as an answer is staggering. We should be working towards civilized solutions, and only resort to violence when we must. I believe that we still have options for handling a lot of the issues in our country peacefully, even if those options are dwindling.
- Letting society come to an end so that we can “keep some decency” in it is ridiculous.
- It is possible to be “better than them” and not let them line us all up for the gallows.
- You are not “better than them”. You literally are them. They are us. Stop being an arrogant dick head. You don’t get to be exempt because you are somehow superior.
Exactly. Us lefties gotta take note but so it better lol
Alexandria is at what is supposed to be one of the highest echelons in out government and all she can do is send out a tweet?
Couldn’t the DNC get together and start raising alarm bells? This is dereliction of duty all around.
The government is billowing smoke and people are running in with tnt rather than fire hoses.
Lol nice bait 👍👌💯
Does people having an opinion scare you? Or is this just more bait?
“Congress members should be allowed to single handedly overrule a court of law while the trial is in process, based on their personal opinion. I am very smart.”
Who said that? Things have escalated beyond the bounds of responsible governing. What is wrong with a concerted effort speaking out against it?
“All she can do is send out a tweet”
as opposed to?
I stated what I thought she could do. She can speak with her colleagues. She can speak with the media. She can hold town halls. There is something seriously wrong with what’s going on and you have congress who will just let the judicial branch over extend their power.
When a leader, or effectively hundreds of leaders, cannot lead they are no longer leaders. They are place holders.
The most dangerous game
The hunting of Man happens with Trump’s homeless policy.
Hear me out here. It’s not trump, he’s a pawn that will be assassinated after election to further the dictatorship that they are planning. It’s a coup from the shadows. He’s just dumb enough to do what they want.
SCOTUS justices apparently think it’s a game considering they even consented to take this case.
SCOTUS justices think the Constitution is a joke.
You mean like Soleimani? Or is this only scary when killing burguerlanders?
burguerlanders? lol
There’s a pretty big difference between an act of war against a state eager to call themselves your enemies and the execution of internal dissidents.
Not at war with Iran or Libya genius.
Lol, sure. Because an act of war is the same thing as being at war.
…I suppose you think that’s a clever statement.
No, I don’t, I think that’s the problem.
Do you have a dictionary?
Ya, so its super important that Biden doesnt COMPLETELY shit the bed and disenfranchise the sweeping majority of American liberals. Right?
I think all the smart liberals and leftists have realized an immunity ruling would be used against them.
Yeah, but we’re talking about the Democratic leadership.
What would be wild is if the “legal” justification they landed on was that the president specifically is immune but not the people under him. So you’d just have to hand Biden or Trump a handgun and watch them march up to someone and kill them because no police or military has the authority to stop the president
Obviously I don’t want to live in that world but at least then we’re living in a crazy movie dystopia which might at least be more fun to watch
Biden/Trump/Whoever is president could simply officially order one of his top officers to push a button that drops a hellfire missile on their political opponent and then pardon them. The President is the commander-in-chief of the armed forces and also has the executive privilege of pardon available to them at their discretion for any reason or no reason at all. I’m 100% sure the president will find somebody in the chain of command with morals flexible enough to obey such an order.
And since you can’t go after the man himself because a corrupt SCOTUS is apparently poised to rule that they have immunity for “official acts” which is a nebulously defined term that can apply to literally any heinous act that they want, the country has essentially created a king by proxy.
Let’s let Joe have it. He’s old, he deserves it. How many fatalities can he even get before the long night takes him? 3? 4?
Come on, Joe, invite Tucker and Alex Jones to dinner.
And wouldn’t anyone in the line of succession to the presidency just be able to kill all those in front of them to take the
throneseat of president, thus becoming immune from the act of killing their predessesors?
The claim is also in perpetuity of the title, not just while holding office.
If this passes, Obama needs to walk right up to Trump, and slap him like a bitch.
So he’s saying Biden is legally within his rights to assassinate Trump?
Obama and Trump literally ordered hits on (foreign) political rivals so I don’t get the pearl.clutching at a lawyer answering like a lawyer on the topic
We get the president from “Escape from L A”
He also might be The Thing. That’s just what I’m hearing, lots of people are saying it.
That might be true, but the gays are turning the frogs gay! Enough is enough! Maga 2024 /s