![](/static/827deb4e/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
Seems about right. Profit over people, right?..
Seems about right. Profit over people, right?..
4-5 year prison sentence for planning a roadblock… I’ve seen child sex offenders get smaller sentences.
Just because it’s handled at state level, doesn’t mean it has to be handled at state level.
The federal government could easily give money to states with the stipulation that x amount is used to pay teachers.
I mean… that’s not that new. And most people are just lurkers anyways.
I wish I could upvote this twice lol
False scarcity and hoarding capital
*Fossil fuel infrastructure goes vroom
One person’s definition of order != Order
The final battle between Avatar Aang and Ozai.
I’m hoping to be fully self-hosted by then.
It was probably because the munitions didn’t fit in the cargo plane with the fighter jets and armored vehicles that were due to be shipped.
Hopefully it’s just a minor delay and we can get back to killing children soon 🤞
For now… Do you really think they’re immune to enshitification if they become more popular?
They’ll even do things like paying off regulators so that they repeal laws that limit profit
You’re obviously just lazy and don’t want to work…
/s
If they didn’t sell oil, there wouldn’t be a giant, pseudo-city in the desert. Those people would probably build elsewhere, if at all.
I still don’t get the reasoning behind these sort of geo engineering projects. Let’s say, best case scenario, it works wonders and cools the planet significantly.
The fact that we found a “solution” to the warming temperatures will justify the actions if the corporations pumping tons of CO2 and methane into the atmosphere. If anything, it will encourage them to pollute more, as there is now a way to solve the problem.
De-growth is the only way to actually solve the problem. But since it’s not profitable, it won’t happen under the current economic system.
I remember reading a study from Japan a few years ago. It related the country’s percent GDP investment in renewables vs power consumption of the population over time. The conclusion was, that the more GDP they invested in renewable power generation, the more overall power was available, which the population consumed.
Old power sources didn’t go away. There is just another source available. It’s an addictive effect, not a replacement of power sources.
I tried searching for the article again a few months later, but I couldn’t find it… I wouldn’t be surprised if it was removed or hidden, considering it is objective evidence against being able to buy our way of this problem.
I’m 30 and I literally have 2 electric skateboards lol
Tbf, so did the Israel Palatine conflict, if not earlier.