Jeremy [Iowa]

In fact I’d argue they’re more free as they don’t have to worry about being involved in a massacre just because some white male incel fuckup is having a bad day.

Fortunately, the only reason to have such fear is media sensationalism and your personal failure to understand the statistics.

Despite the fearmongering, you’re still not even close to likely to experience one.

Oh, hey, how about that - didn’t expect to see an r/Iowa refugee over here. Welcome to the greener pastures that are generally just as painfully, unthinkingly liberal but far less cancerous.

That requires active engagement in one’s community beyond vote-shaming and whining on social media - you’re not going to see much of this from either party.

Actual community involvement is hard. let’s go joe, blue no matter who, if you don’t vote blue you enable fascists etc. is easy and still lets them feel good about doing something… even if it’s ultimately ineffective.

I see Newsom is going for the “stricken down as unconstitutional” high score. I wonder how long it’ll be until we see this one going to Benitez…

Unfortunately, you will literally never be able to guarantee that.

No, as knee-jerk reactions to a single facet of an outlier event are absurd.

As an comparison, your highlight of child porn is due to the actual harm of actual abuse - the thing is banned because it cannot exist without traumatizing and abusing children. Your highlight of an outlier shooting is really the highlight of the potential harm of a future event - the thing might maybe be used for harm.

Most of us don’t live our lives in terror of inanimate objects or overrepresented and oversensationalized events.

From the article you posted. The rest is math. They decided to do the project in 2019. Grants take anywhere from 8-20 months to get funded. It also takes time to put together the application.

Ah, I see - you argue that a department is Biden’s for nothing more than his being President at the time.

And since you’re being rude, for ages was clearly bullshit too. You linked an article talking about research that was conceived in 2019.

Don’t project.

You could argue it was exaggerating, sure. It doesn’t change the information has been available and continues to be summarily ignored by both parties.

You’re linking an article about a study funded by Biden’s justice department and the other poster is right about your both sides comments.

Care to support that?

The OPs article is about an office Biden is creating for this exact type of research too.

Right - Biden, of AR-ban fame.

It remains to be seen whether or not this office will support any research or just parrot Everytown.

I understand the frustration. I have a 13 year old who his mom has tucked away in gun loving rural America.

But your both sidesisms are not helpful.

I don’t believe you do, given your refusal to hold blue team accountable for their failings here in doing anything beyond focusing on symptoms. I’d argue such willful partisan blindness is less helpful.

We’ve known how to meaningfully address this for ages - with the side benefit of actually improving lives - and neither party is willing to pursue it as it lies outside partisan wedge-driving around various bans.

If you’re interested in cost-effectiveness, hold out for the deals on SaveMyServer. I ended up with a 48TB Dell R720xd for like $500 delivered. 36TB usable in a RAID5 is nothing to sneeze at, plus it’s an amazing chassis for, say, GPU accelerated transcode.

Ah, the false dichotomy, neat.

Abstaining is always an option. You can always just ignore either shady individual - you aren’t required to pick one.

You can summarize by thinking of vertical scaling as “make machine bigger / more powerful” with horizontal scaling as “make more machines”.