2010 blur? You can play it using pseudo lan network softwares. Me and my mates still play it.

Or if it’s Celsius, bring God.

You’d love singapore’s name for the toilet to tap, it’s call NEWWater.

So what has everyone moved on to?

It was “not a mistake” for army leadership to not having a contact with the dude.

Burning fields in FarCry 3 jamming to skrillax.

Wanted a game, back then wasn’t available in my country unless I travelled 3 hours to a city that had one store that had the game, also was too expensive and no way I would’ve convinced parents to spend it on game. Shores of high sea are always at your doorstep.

Boycott? Man people are shit. Number of people that I know who cannot go without meat for a single meal is way too high. I study in a masters course about sustainability, out of 52, 41 eat beef (arguable the worst kind of meat for environment) more than 3 times a week. Some of those 41 are hardcore environmental activist and go to protests and demonstrations. Hypocrisy is real. They’re willing to give up car, but not meat. It boggles my mind.

At least for games, I check how big is the dev team, anything bigger than 30 then pirate Then I check if owner of the development studio is public company, if yes then pirate Then I check if owner owns more than one development studio, if yes then pirate Then I check how many games studio has released, if more than 10, pirate Then I check how many copies have been sold on steam, more than 1m, pirate

If a game dev team fails all above checks, I will still pirate first, but if i enjoy pirated copy, I’ll buy the game to support the dev.

Why so many downvotes to what is clearly a joke.

It’s not Palestine. No one cares /s

To be honest it always bothers me that civil wars have been raging in one or the other African country throughout last century, genocide, ethno-state, famine etc have been raging almost all the time.

It’s never been interesting enough for most media in east or in the west. Heck even some media in Africa doesn’t care either. Some human rights groups care, but their funding is limited, and no one questions who is supplying weapons to African genocide propogators and I used to think it’s all Russian or Russian copied Chinese weapons, but last year when I was looking at things in depth, they also have NATO weapons, but I couldn’t find how they got it.

Agreed, also the .part file can be played in VLC as well, it’s the same thing as copy pasting the link in VLC though, but this way you can keep the file.

To answer your question in short , is it safely possible? No.

From your replies it seems your ISP is active against piracy. If budget is tight I recommend, use seedr.cc it gives you 2gb free and it torrents on your behalf, so you’re legally safe. Also you can extend seedr.cc to 4gb as WELL without paying. Dm me if you want to know how.

I know it’s not enough for big games and stuff, but most TV shows and movies you can find decent 1080p rips within that.

Anything else will require some investment/cost.

Further digging down now, I think you have a point, UK quotes Natural gas that’s uncompressed, LNG will add more on those factors. So howarth LNG assessment probably makes more sense here.

However couple of things that bother me

1. Study compares domestic coal and shipped LNG, not sure how reasonable that comparison is
2. Japan is not pushing more capital on LNG, their stupidity is jumping directly to hydrogen/ammonia based economy

Also I am not advocating for starting new LNG based plants, any new investment should be towards renewables. But if there is flexibility of shifting loads between existing plants, one should prefer LNG over coal.

We still need to get rid of all fossil fuels, but LNG is significantly better than coal almost 40% better and that includes life cycle emissions so it includes sea shipping.

Image attached is UK based and assuming sea shipping to Japan is probably higher than this but it’s not like Japan produces its own coal, so it’s gonna be sea shipping for both of them, so differential wouldn’t change that much you can still expect at least 35% savings on emissions.

So I would argue ultimate goal should be complete phase out of carbon emissions for sure, but LNG is significantly better than coal.

Source

IT’S BBC.

Amen

Legit question

Why is this funny, why am I laughing

It was six years of property taxes my bro, it is like saying your rent is 1400 and tax is 10,000.