Bandwidth doesn’t put a hard limit on bitrate either. It’s one variable, but there’s also SNR (See Shannon). With a fixed bandwidth, you can have low bitrate and excellent low-SNR performance (think of Olivia), or you can have higher bitrates, and require stronger signals. For practical purposes though, you are not going to get highspeed internet on HF. But that’s what sharing is like. 🤷♂️
It’s a neat idea, but could be implemented entirely in software with a RTLSDR. Not my cup of tea, but I’m all for absolutely ANYTHING that gets more activity on V/UHF.
A longer term project goal for me would be a SBC and a couple RTLSDRs with a good antenna that simultaneously does APRS igating, streaming audio of all the local repeaters and a few simplex channels, and notifications like this project, and like the “adventure radio” project that uses CTCSS tones to trigger alerts. I think it would be a nice service to provide for locals. The only “trick” is that RTLSDRs can only simultaneously decode within a 2.5mhz window, so it would probably require a little scanning to cover everything, or too many sticks. Doing a project cheaply, but effectively, encourages copy-cats.
50 meters is enough for a 80m 1/2w dipole. And yes, google a “fan dipole” - you can hang multiple dipoles below each other with as little as a few inches of separation. However, the dipoles interact with each other, and getting it right gets more troublesome the more you do.
Neat idea. Odd that those diagonal telescoping rods don’t interfere with the yagi pattern?
fyi, nearly everyone that succeeds in achieving morse proficiency recommend strongly against any sort of visual cues like this. It’s an auditory “language” and adding visual interpretation steps just adds cognitive load and hurts in the long run. It may be fine if your goal is to learn max 5 words per minute or something extremely slow.
On HF, unfortunately, physics is going to keep you from having high speed data. The Shannon–Hartley theorem puts a ceiling on the maximum bitrate of a channel in the presence of noise. If you are on HF with your 100w transceiver and a dipole antenna, your signals are always going to be weak enough on the other end of a skywave contact to limit your data throughput. Even given a magical ham prodigy that invents the best mode imaginable, it’s going to be Kbps, not Mbps. If you want to learn about the development of open source, higher throughput digital modes for HF, I highly recommend David Rowe’s blog on the development of FreeDV over the years. There’s even a recent move to general data in addition to digital voice. However, we are talking about single digit Kbps digital. There are some other modems used by the Winlink folk that are a little higher. The drop of the baudrate limit will just remove an artificial contraint, and headache, on that development.
On line-of-sight VHF and up connections, it gets easier and easier as you have higher gain antennas pointed at each other and lower natural noise figures.