This site mostly has articles that creatively rearrange parts of facts and sprinke sciency terminology to make incredible claims.
A retired physicist having a thought experiment on prehistoric remains years ago in a different context, plus some rando claiming these are man-made structures, becomes: “another hypothesis is that it was constructed by prehistoric human civilization (like described in the Silurian Hypothesis by NASA scientists)”
Software developer here. I only apply for onsite jobs if I believe I will be able to formally or informally switch to hybrid once I build some trust.
Spam.
AI generated site that re-hosts an existing game.
Example of clearly AI drivel, the instruction for the player to “explain your answer”
You may or may not be making a valid point, but you need to be clearer about who you are referring to and in which context.
Vague and does not cite sources meaningfully. The words that appear to link to sources, just link to other articles on the site.
Because the political leanings of a combat unit has zero bearing on anything. They are not in charge. They are not being allied with. They have aligned interests in fighting a greater evil.
So any attempts to pretend it matters does clearly, nakedly, come from a place of wanting to push back against supporting Ukraine’s defense.
Spot on.
Rough summary of when it is energy and effort efficient: https://xkcd.com/1924/
Did you comment based only on your interpretation of the title?
I think a lot of people can chill naturally instead or chilling briefly and through immense focus. Must be nice.
Bringing the ships into waters completely monitored by countries friendly to Ukraine, and surrounded by a number of launching points for sabotage actions by basically anyone.
It would be a risky move if anybody cared about their navy, or felt it was a threat.
You misinterpreted it.
Where does that headline phrasing come from? The study does not, and does not claim to, pinpoint anything for autism.
They use mice bred for hypersensitivity, and look at which parts of those mice’s brains can be suppressed to reduce measured sensitivity to heated floors and electric shock.
They use “mice models of autism” to get an indication of where to maybe start looking on the slim chance it turns out to be similar in humans.
The mouse model may turn out to be a different kind of hypersensitivity altogether. Human brains may wire hypersensitivity very differently. The observed results may be that the mice’s reactions are different instead of weaker. Etc…
It is valid science, but a long shot away from a long shot at being applicable for autism in humans.
Any action other than assisting the invaders would be an improvement.
Yes, the oppressed are eager to hurt people any way they can, and nobody can expect it to be any other way.
But still, launching long range missiles isn’t an impulse action. There are so many actors domestic and internationally to do production, procurement, installation, logistics, assembly, that we can assume someone high up has made a strategic decision based on expected outcome.
And the expected outcome is extremely obvious: a) zero tactical gains, and b) more excuses to ignore international pressure and hit Rafah even more brutally.
A doctor commented on how alarming it was that he suffered liver damage from the project - it was on a level they only saw in people drining heavily.
“You could consider donating to some organizations researching what caused you to be this way, so maybe one day we will have pre-natal screening available.”
If heads of state can be held responsible for war crimes in the middle east, it sets a dangerous precedent for the US.
Shadowbans are sitewide and almost always automates actions to counter spam.
Your chances are better if you avoid doing “spam-like” things:
If you are unlucky and caught in a false positive, there is an /appeals form that is usually helpful.
A good example of https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_balance