• danc4498@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Honest question, did we fight the Nazis because they were Nazis as we know them today (genocidal/racist/fascist)? Or did we fight the Nazis because they were attacking our allies?

    • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      That’s a complicated question without a clear answer. It’s hard to establish the motivations of an individual person, but much harder when you’re talking about the entire country. Generally, people were united in the war effort, but for a variety of reasons. The NYT downplayed the Holocaust and specifically tried to avoid focusing on antisemitism, in part because they were worried that people wouldn’t like the idea of fighting a war to protect Jewish people, as racism and antisemitism were very much present. On the other hand, you had people like folk singer Woody Guthrie who explicitly connected the war to anti-fascism in his songs. But there were also plenty of people and media who had been praising Hitler, before he started invading everywhere.

      Basically there were lots of reasons for lots of people to dislike the Nazis, so it’s kind of hard to detangle who was motivated by what and to what degree. Generally though, if they had kept to their own borders, it’s unlikely that any other country would have invaded them just for being fascists, and many countries went through great lengths not to go to war with them, because nobody wanted to recreate the devastation of WWI. Even then the US wasn’t willing to get directly involved until it was directly attacked.

        • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Yes, that’s what I said at the end. The US didn’t get involved until directly attacked.

          It’s notable that the US decided to get involved and to focus on the European theater, despite being attacked by Japan. But that doesn’t really tell us about motivations. It could be that the US considered Nazi ideology more dangerous than Japan’s ideology, or it’s possible they were more interested in Europe for the sake of their allies, or it could’ve been a purely strategic decision.

    • PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Both. The autocratic bend that was already known of provided plenty of fuel for the pro-war camp, and it was a lot of what motivated Roosevelt to want to back the Allies as much as he was legally allowed.

      Pearl Harbor was a tragedy, but as Churchill is attributed to have said, never let a good crisis go to waste.

      Japan basically provided all the excuse the pro war camp needed to leeroy jenkins themselves at Hitler’s face.

      We built the bomb with the intention of using them on Germany, that is the kind of axe you’ve got to grind with someone who you hate for a lot more reasons than just that they socked your best mate.

    • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      The US government under Roosevelt was opposed to the Nazis from the start, before WW2 began, on account of its fascist character.

      While America was deeply racist at the time, it was also very unevenly racist, and even prominent Nazi fellow-travelers like Charles Lindbergh expressed revulsion at the level of Nazi racism displayed.

      The genocide proper didn’t begin until WW2, and by the time we were already, for all practical purposes, ‘in the game’, so to speak.

    • mctoasterson@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Read Eisenhowers D-Day remarks. Most Americans believed the Nazis were a genuinely dangerous, oppressive evil that, left unchecked, were likely to subjugate the whole of Europe. Both their ideology and methods had to be rebuked on a moral level.

    • Wanderer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Because you got invaded. Nothing else.

      Churchill (part American) always thought the Americans would join the war but they didn’t.

      Germany was getting held up in Russia and Japan attacked America. Hitler thought if he declared war on America then Japan would declare war on Russia. Hitler was more worried about Russia so it was a good trade. Unfortunately for him Japan kept they pact of non aggression with Russia so it just caused him another enemy.

    • FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Uhh…yes, because yes. They didn’t just burst onto the scene after Kristallnacht but once the regular folk see the pogroms it’s suddenly a war crime

      If you grab a book on Henry ford and his ilk then you’ll need a book on Reconstruction and then a book on plantations, etc. This is a country by and for land owning white men so there was a lot of stern words before the Infamous day, after that it was a mix of actual Steve Rogers and the same robber barons getting richer but we mostly agreed with the Reich until it hit our shores.

      If Japan stuck to their close neighbors and ze Germans just annexed Western Europe…we probably wouldn’t have all the beach landings and such, see again Ford and his friend list.

  • sudo42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Every year, we open up a stadium for a giant Pro Slavery + Pro Nazi + Pro Confederacy rally. At the end of the rally, we lock all the doors and sell everyone in the stadium to the highest-bidding slavers.

    Everyone at the rally gets to enjoy their pro-slavery desires and everyone else is rid of them. Win-win.

    • EleventhHour@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      um… who do we sell them to? if it’s someone outside the stadium, aren’t they also pro-slavery? wouldn’t that mean they’d also be in the stadium? also, wouldn’t we, then, end up with a lot of slaves?

      this seems like a bad idea for a few reasons, the least of which is the hypocrisy…

        • Rolando@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Hmmm… it wouldn’t be circular if we had “levels” of slaves. Imagine you only directly enslaved the people in the level below you, and you were only directly enslaved by the people in the level above you. I think it would still end up circular in places, though, so maybe we should call these “classes” instead.

          Wait a minute… MyGodIGetItNow.jpg

          • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            Not strong slavery. Never mention the word.

            But make it so if you didn’t play along then you would be cared for if you fell ill. Or you couldn’t get food. And you could only level up if you passed the right exams.

            Make sure the highest slave owner pays a different kind of tax to the others at a much lower rate.

            Make sure ownership can be inherited with relative ease.

        • AeonFelis@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Maybe a circular chain (no pun intended) of slavery can work if the circle is long enough? Each slave/slaver will get abused by their master and take out their frustration abusing their own slave. While it’s true that if you go far enough in either direction you’ll eventually reach yourself, there is not much you can do about it - even if you try to order your slave to order their slave to order their slave … to order their slave to free you, by the time that order reaches your own master the incentive to enforce it will be so diminished that they could ignore it without much consequence.

          Of course, in order for this to work we need a rule that a master cannot order their slave to give them their slave. Or - to be on the safe side - a master cannot interfere with what a slave does with their own slaves.

  • WoahWoah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    How are these people not named and shamed? They are just standing there in public with no mask on wearing a swastika and giving a nazi salute? And then, what, they go back to selling real estate or what…? When is this even from?

    • SupraMario@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Because most of them have no jobs and live off the gov. While talking shit about people who aren’t racist cock wagons, that use gov support. So they have nothing to lose.

      • WoahWoah@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Thanks for the Snopes link, that gave some more context. I still can’t believe no one figured out who she and the others are. It’s just mind boggling to me, maybe because she’s young-ish, that no one was like oh my god is that Sharon??

        I mean, that someone can live and do whatever they do, show up to this event with no mask and do this, and then go back to living a normal life is crazy to me. People lose their jobs for saying something racist on camera, and this person is full nazi-ing it up seemingly with no social consequences.

      • Optional@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I wonder if she knows the Jan 6 girl from knoxville. Who was upset the cops pushed her out of the capitol and she got maced

  • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Wait till OP learns about what America did to non-white people in its’ history.

    The Nuremberg race laws were inspired by JimCrow and were actually less restrictive.

    • IzzyScissor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Wait until ButtHurt hears that that’s literally what we’re talking about and their ‘gotcha’ is meaningless bullshit.

      • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        How is the fact that america was built on white supremacy and literally inspired Nazi policy whataboutism?

        • BigFig@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Because that’s not what we’re talking about in this thread. You’re bringing up other atrocities and moving the spot light off of the topic at hand

          • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            The post is about the US being an antifascist nation, while it has a very fascist-adjacent history.

            CIA backed coups in south America would be whataboutism. How the US inspired the Nazis: not so much.

            • snooggums@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              How the US inspired the Nazis: not so much.

              …and then we fought a war over it. Do you need to be introduced to a calendar?

              • Dkarma@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                Half the country didn’t want to fight the war, are you daft,? It took pearl harbor to even start to change minds.

              • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                As if the US was the main character of WW2. How arrogant do you have to be?

                When did operation paperclip occur, again?

                • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Operation Paperclip: when we imported Nazis to run our government. Of course. Silly me. That’s why the civil rights movement had its greatest successes and prominence right after WW2, because of all the fascists we decided to empower.

            • JayleneSlide@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              The history of the US isn’t “fascist-adjacent;” we’ve had our heads ALL THE WAY UP THAT ASS since the beginning and ongoing. Most of the founding fathers were worried that an “excess of democracy” would be bad for business (season 4 of “Scene on Radio,” https://sceneonradio.org/category/season-4/page/2/).

              The US’ crusade against all things vaguely left of center goes even deeper than I ever thought. It’s a bit surprising how many of the most dreadful dictators in the past 100 years were graduates of the School of the Americas and/or installed by the CIA. See: “The Jakarta Method” by Vincent Bevins.

              Prunebutt is right here: the US was, at best, laissez-faire about Nazis until it wasn’t. Nazis were good for business. I’ve read a lot on the topic, but can’t find any good citations at the moment. This is an accessible, albeit lightweight entry point: https://time.com/5414055/american-nazi-sympathy-book/. But listen to just about year of “Behind the Bastards,” and it’s a deep rabbit hole of how closely tied to fascism the US had always been.

              • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                Prunebutt is right here: the US was, at best, laissez-faire about Nazis until it wasn’t.

                Oh, I guess I must have imagined the Roosevelt administration being stridently anti-Nazi from the beginning, and the mass protests whenever Nazis showed up in the US. Silly me.

                • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Oh, I guess I must have imagined

                  Well, I guess you must have been there, if you didn’t imagine it. /s

                  Clarification: that was a joke and not supposed to be a proper addition to the argument.

                • JayleneSlide@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  Oh, I guess I must have imagined the Roosevelt administration being stridently anti-Nazi from the beginning, and the mass protests whenever Nazis showed up in the US. Silly me.

                  You are correct that you are imagining this, because the US’ relationship to Germany was definitely complex. Roosevelt was far from “stridently anti-Nazi” until Kristallnacht (1938 Nov 9), at which point Roosevelt recalled the US ambassador to Germany and allowed the 12,000 visiting Germans to remain in the US. However, despite allowing those Germans to stay, he did not push to increase immigration quotas.

                  Prior to Kristallnacht, the Roosevelt administration, Hollywood, petroleum companies, and much of the manufacturing base were very pro-Nazi Germany. The administration assisted Germany in circumventing boycotts while US petroleum companies provided fuel and oil despite European sanctions. Sources: Robert Evans (“Behind the Bastards”), Rafael Medoff (“Roosevelt’s Pre-war Attitude Toward the Nazis”)

        • Todd Bonzalez@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Nobody ever said it was. This was a call for anti-fascism.

          If you want to argue down a call for action against Fascism, go for it, but don’t act surprised when people call you a Fascist for it.

          If there’s a real point you wish to make, it’s lost in way you’ve presented it. Instead of being a miserable scold, you could have added to the conversation, but since feel that everything you post needs to be in the form of a rebuttal, it comes across as though you are trying to completely invalidate OP’s meme rather than add little color to it.

          Everyone here already knows about America’s troubled history. You’re preaching to the choir. It really sounds like you’re defending Nazis by claiming that America is somehow the “real evil” when OP’s post can pretty succinctly be summarized as “Nazis Bad”.

          We did fight Nazis in WWII, everything else notwithstanding, and we are going to have to do it again soon. We’re trying to figure out who is on what side, and with your attitude, you’re going to end up being an honorary fascist since you’re going to throw a semantic tantrum every time someone signals anti-fascism.

          • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            This was a call for anti-fascism.

            … By way of national pride, forgetting the US’s “troubled” past. Trying to counter fascism with patriotism is a dangerous game.

            Everyone here already knows about America’s troubled history. You’re preaching to the choir.

            The responses seem too differ.

            You’re awfully glib about a looming civil war.

            Sure, the person disliking patriotism will be an “honorary fascist”. /s 🙄

            • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              forgetting the US’s “troubled” past

              The Confederacy is right there. In the meme.

              Are you even trying?

              • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                Like the confederacy was the only time the US was white supremacist. Ever heard of Nixon and how his war on drugs was just a strategy to criminalize black people (and leftists)?

                • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  I’m sorry the meme doesn’t acknowledge every crime of the USA in the space of one photo and three sentences?

  • Cobrachicken@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    These days, and especially with the continuing shift to the right in Europe, I’m repeatedly asking myself what the attractiveness of these ideologies is, that so many people again fall for them. They represent destruction not future. They do not have a plan for the future, they are only “against” everything good.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      People want quick solutions to complicated problems. What quicker solution is there to all of your problems than blaming it on a disadvantaged group of people and persecuting them for it?

      They never realize it’s not an effective solution until they’re way too established in the “kill the X” mode.

    • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      They construct an ideology where everything was great way back when foreign powers were jealous of our national heritage and destroyed everything. It’s a very easy to grasp and convenient myth, since your nation becomes the main character of history.

      Nationalism/patriotism is very succeptible to falling for fascist ideology. Therefore, everyone waving their national flag with pride is sus to me.

      • SLVRDRGN@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Your last sentence especially hit it home for me. I’m not currently proud of America, and I myself would feel like a total jamoke waving around the US flag with a grin right now.

        But I will vote and try my best to fight for a country that I can be proud of.

        • ...m...@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          …one can support american ideals without supporting actions of the american state: it’s our choice which that flag represents…

          …sadly, fascists have so brazenly siezed the apparatus of our state that whenever i see its flag proudly unfurled these days, my first reaction is to associate its bearer with fascism…

    • yeather@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Fascism preys on the ideas of regime change and stagnation. Physically, a government wishing to gather power through voters will promise new public works, a focus on workers, and the general embetterment of society. Ideologically, fascism promises a purging of those in power, those that lead the stagnation and bad working conditions that started the movement. They conveniently pin in on a group of people or a few undesirable groups to appeal to a large number of the population and then make a grab for power. Bad times and stagnation create fascism.

    • GladiusB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      They are looking for a community that accepts them. That’s why they are usually from broken poor white people with drug problems. Their parents are absent in many ways and are looking for somewhere to belong.

    • Hylactor@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Same thing any “in group” feeds on: self esteem. If you feel powerless, or worthless, or rudderless, any group that makes you feel powerful, valuable, and effective is going to be very appealing. Conservatives (read: fascists) prey on this. They make it seem like joining them is brave, and important. And since their followers lack identity and purpose, their self worth becomes entangled with [in group], be it closeted fascism such as the American GOP, or flaming such as Q/proud boys/whatever. And since their identity and value depends on the perpetuation and proliferation of their in group, they willingly accept lies and falsehood. Pretty easy to gaslight someone who’s encouraging it.

      Then when they wear their symbols of hate, or make shocking claims, or in anyway troll and grief society, up to and including dismantling democracy, they get a reaction. They’ve exerted their will on the world around them, and as such they feel powerful. The insidious bit is, even if the good guys win, with all their high falutin factual arguments and social programs, it just makes these sad people angier and feel worthless again. So they go right back to their pimps for some more sweet lies and marching orders.

      • taiyang@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        This is spot on and something I teach in social psychology. One thing that helps is increasing membership in other groups so that the dismantling of one group doesn’t fracture their self identity. Granted I usually teach this with more benign examples (e.g. if you’re a “good student” and get a bad grade, it hurts more depending on how important it is to your identity). But the idea is the same.

        A few things you can look up though: cognitive dissonance, confirmation biases, contact hypothesis, and probably a few more. The funny thing is, social psychology as a discipline boomed after WW2 because people wanted to know why Nazis were Nazis. It’s only recently we also realized that social rejection uses the same parts of the brain as physical pain, though.

    • qarbone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Why are you assuming most people care or are capable of reasoning about some vague “future”? Right now they feel disenfranchised because right now some <insert slur> is getting uppity.

    • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      It provides easy answers.

      You’re a good strong person. They’re bad people. All your problems are their fault

      Most people love feeling like they’re part of a group.

    • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Did we metaphorically have a war over these things? With metaphorical Henrys and metaphorical M1 Garands?