• petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Ohhh my godd, me too. It’s so anti-intellectual.

    To anyone who might care, you can identify an apple as a low-quality orange, but that doesn’t also mean the apple is a low-quality apple; they’re optimized to different ends. That is, I think, the point of the expression.

    But, if we’re trying to evaluate them on something like taste, which is entirely subjective, yeah, I’m comparing those shits. And, I’m going oranges all the way.

    • CaptnNMorgan@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      You shouldn’t compare apples and oranges because they are both great but for different reasons and purposes. It isn’t anti-intellectual to recognize that apples are way better for pies than oranges are but if you want some amazing juice and don’t want to go through a whole process to make it good; oranges are the way to go.

      This and the many other examples I didn’t want to fill this page with are the reason why it’s a saying. It’s much faster than prefacing what exactly said apples and oranges are going to be used for before giving a real answer and I personally feel it shouldn’t at all be taken literally.