• FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    4 months ago

    It’s incorrect to think that losing access to markets is beneficial for anyone, which is why using it as a bargaining chip to make people stop murdering each other is a good thing. Even if this imaginary Global South organization had another provider for goods, they’re at risk of being abused or manipulated by a lower number of trade partners who can increase prices at will.

    I’m sorry that you disagree.

    • appel@whiskers.bim.boats
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Provider for goods? What are you on about? Western nations outsource all production to the global south (pretty much) and the only thing they make is overpriced software (hyperbole)

    • تحريرها كلها ممكن@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Some markets aren’t worth the trouble. It is not like Iran is losing access to China. It is losing access to a market that it had very limited access to if any.

    • davel@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      It’s incorrect to think that losing access to markets is beneficial for anyone

      It almost never is, but in this case the Global North’s sanctions are forcing the Global South to build alliances amongst themselves, and this shift is likely to be quite durable.

      Geopolitical Economy Hour, Apr. 2023: Russia Leaves the Neoliberal West to Join the World Majority