• finkrat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    No far left is “dissenters will be forcibly ‘re-educated’ or removed from society or put down”. “Far” is general violent intolerance. Your post is standard left vs. far right.

        • hOrni@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          Seems You want to be sarcastic with this question. Care to give an example to back up Your argument? I might be wrong, but I think “totalitarian” is the opposite of leftism.

        • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          That’s not a far left position, though. That’s about strategy and implementation, which can be as violent as possible or peaceful as possible, and still be far left.

    • michaelmrose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      You can argue that this time we can make communism work guys and abolishing most private property would be considered far left. I don’t think violence is implicit in the extreme left like it is with the far right its just the natural consequences of any authoritarian government regardless of orientation.

      The other problem with comparing the two is that even though left and right—by American standards— are SOMEWHAT equally represented the far right is like 30% of the pop and the far left more like 1%. Electing the left caries no risk of the extreme folks running the show they barely have a voice. Electing the right implicitly means letting the extremists run the show they are the majority of the right.

    • JimVanDeventer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      I have been missing the nutty and nonsensical comments from Reddit. I’m so happy Lemmy has grown big enough that we now have our own weird bots to rewrite history for us. #Blessed 🥰