It’s gotten rather absurd. If my interaction is with a kiosk short of being handed something, it’s an insulting extra step. I’m already paying the price for my employer’s pay scale … I can’t take on someone else’s stinginess.

Archive link

  • JCPhoenix@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    That goes without saying. That’s true of any of this conversation; no one has to go to a restaurant. No one has to use Doordash. No one has to go to a barber shop for a haircut. That doesn’t mean tipping and “force tips” are still OK.

    Either way, I didn’t mean to cause such consternation. I’ve never taken a cab in Vegas, but having driven on Las Vegas Blvd myself during non-event times…yeah, I could see how that’d be a nightmare. Add on F1, with road closures and more clueless tourists than usual… I’d probably not drive a taxi (or even driving personally) for a week either!

    I guess in some ways, the addition of a surcharge here represents a truer cost of the service. It’d be like a restaurant not allowing tipping, but paying workers a much higher wage, while also upping the cost of the food and everything to account for that. And there’d be no “free rider” like we might see with those who don’t tip. Every customer has to pay their fair share, so to speak.

    Though, like you’re saying, it’s still probably not enough. I wonder how much a taxi ride in Vegas would have to cost to make it worthwhile for a driver every time. I suppose if there’s anywhere in the US where this experiment would work, it’d be Vegas. People pay a lot for the whole experience. Hell, they literally give money away to the casinos. Might as well get a little bit more out of them.