• scumola@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    btop doesn’t update all of the characters for me after a while if I leave it open for a long time, and eventually it stops updating altogether.

    • voxel@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      yeah you need a decently fast hw accelerated terminal for it
      for example, the gnome terminal is pretty slow; if you’re using it, try running it in alacrity or kitty and see if that improves performance.

      • brax@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        I’ll have to check it out. I’ve seen kitty mentioned a few times but I’m an oldschool xterm kinda guy lol

      • brax@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Oh, you might actually be right there… I’m not sure now I didn’t realize there were alternatives.

        I remember trying it a while back when I found a list of fancy looking terminal apps. It was fancy, but it came at the cost of performance.

      • brax@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        My laptop went bonkers trying to run it, maybe I have something misconfigured somewhere. I wanted to like it because it looks great, but I couldn’t because it was seemingly too resource intensive.

        • Rin@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          i see, that’s a bit of a shame because i enjoy it a lot.

          • brax@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            Somebody mentioned I may have been running bpytop, so maybe this whole thing is my bad. I honestly can’t remember what I ran now - I thought it was btop

  • 4am@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    I just wish there was a .deb package.

    Still gonna get around to making a playbook for installing it someday. btop (and it’s predecessors) are awesome.

    • caseyweederman@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      There’s a deb in Ubuntu Universe.
      Oh heck, it’s in Debian Bookworm too, and Bullseye-Backports.
      Debs all around.

      • 4am@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        I could have sworn I checked and didn’t find it. I’ll look again, maybe I did something wrong

  • WuTang @lemmy.ninja
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    why ? Why do you feel the need to have process monitoring displayed all the time?

      • WuTang @lemmy.ninja
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        no, I am questioning why do you have those open all the time. in 17y, I never had to. This is just ASCII pr0n to look “deep” .

        • 1984@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          You are right, they aren’t open all the time except in screenshots. :)

        • spacedout@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          I have it open all the time, exactly for this reason. 15 years and going.

  • bizdelnick@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Both are useless toys for newbie sysadmins who think their job is sitting and looking at list of processes.

        • Aatube@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          If it looks better and does the same thing efficiently, I’ll take the thing that looks better.

          • bizdelnick@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            You have a pre-installed tool and a tool that looks better but which you need to install. When you need it for a rare task, and you administer many machines, it is easier to use what you already have on each of them.

              • bizdelnick@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                Sorry, I don’t understand what you are talking about. Yes, you can run them in SSH session. No, you still need to have them installed on the remote machine to do this. And installing diagnostic tools is not only time consuming, sometimes it can be even impossible if you already get in troubles (and if you did not, why would you need them?).

                • Aatube@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  Hmm, that’s a fair argument. I’m pretty sure new server installations can just have their default program list modified though.

        • dmrzl@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Lol, top. Try that to figure out the load on a 256 core DGX slurm setup with that shit. Top is barely usable on consumer hardware…