• dev_null@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    19 days ago

    I don’t know, I feel something that you did as a teenager, and that you have already went to court about, shouldn’t haunt you for the rest of your life any more than it already does with the legally mandated registry.

    • ThunderWhiskers@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      19 days ago

      The guy was accused of raping a child between the ages of 1-11. Do you think that person should ever have anything to do with children? Being 16 does not make this excusable.

      • dev_null@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        19 days ago

        I’m not from the US, but I assume they have laws for this. I’m against vigilante justice against people who were already judged by the legal system. Do you also support not hiring any felon?

        I don’t think he should or shouldn’t be allowed near anyone, I assume if there was a reason to be barred from it by the judge, he would be. Clearly he wasn’t, so I’m not going to be an armchair legal expert and override the judge.

        • ThunderWhiskers@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          19 days ago

          You have a very optimistic view of the American legal system and it does not include nuance such as this. It depends from state to start but generally a sex offender is not legally prohibited from holding just about any position beyond teacher/day care. Some states make it difficult for them to obtain professional licenses. I do not believe any of them actually prohibits “children’s entertainer”.

          Typically that would be considered the purview of the employer.