• Hegar@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      That’s not sufficient.

      A biased fact checking bot should not be allowed to operate in a public forum, giving weight to it’s opinions as though it were a neutral source of truth.

      If you want its services, you can go to their website and use it. It shouldn’t be here.

      • yesman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        I think you’ve inadvertently demonstrated the problem with calling out media “bias”.

        as though it were a neutral source of truth.

        I would be interested to lean what, if anything, you’d say meets this description.

      • bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 months ago

        Report it to the mods, if they consider it is providing “low-effort comments” (Rule 5) then they can block the bot from the community. Else you can block on your own user level.

        • solsangraal@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          2 months ago

          i vote to keep the bot, for no other reason than that dude’s butthurt about it

        • kitnaht@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Blocking it at the user level effectively amplifies it, because then he doesn’t see and downvote it any longer.

    • Maeve@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      2 months ago

      No. I’ll deal with it in the way that seems appropriate for the moment.