While it is no secret that exploitative practices are interlaced with capitalistic tendencies, the practices are becoming intolerable. Signing up to pay usually takes only two clicks that are prominently visible whereas cancelation options are hidden away in deep settings requiring multiple clicks. Pricing often feel arbitrary with no reference points. Every large company grows with the intention of exhibiting monopolistic behavior. This is not sustainable and should not be tolerated.

  • Opacity9850@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Jio Telecom here provides WiFi in my area which we can use to place call through our phones without data pack, but man the permissions that app asks are illogical.

    • evranch@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      To be fair proper integration of an aftermarket VoIP app requires almost every permission a phone has, especially if the app wants to mirror your caller ID, and supports SMS and attaching various media.

  • intensely_human@lemm.ee
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    You should know: if you haven’t noticed dark patterns becoming more prominent, it’s time to get your eyes checked.

  • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Exploitative patterns like those idiotic youtube thumbnails the creators are using to draw extra attention to emotions not actually present in the video?

    Yeah, that. Wish I could give a video -1 view instead of +1 after clicking onto it.

    • Ultragigagigantic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Youtube face.

      People feel the need to monetize everything in their lives just to survive (not thrive). Consider directing your anger towards those who have purchased our government from us. Rather then being mad at the digital equivalent of a dude on a highway offramp holding a cardboard sign and begging for living expenses.

    • Fungah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Who the fuck would rather repeatedly pause and in pause a fucking video, skim past bullshit, skip ads, or hell even USE YouTube over a block of text somewhere that c9ntains the info you were looking for.

      People watch this dog.shit. is it because its.the only.place you can find info anymore? Or do people actually LIKE this format?

      • melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        seriously. “I want to learn about resistors!” doesn’t send me to a nice pretty static graphic I can reference, or a text explanation of the meaning, its some shit head talking for 20 minutes with an seo title and like 2/10 of the pieces of information I needed in a totally unsearchable format.

        and that last bit might be the important part; its not manually user searchable. this matters, and I think its what the companies want, why they love video. it gives them more control.

    • AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      If it isn’t a text file which I can read in 1/10th of the time it would take me to watch a stupid video (if not less), I’m just not bothering.

      • ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Install Blocktube or another extension that stops videos from starting when you open the link, and read the transcript. It used to be at the top, just under the video itself, but now they’ve moved it to the bottom of the video description so you have to go through all the affiliate links just to get to the fucking transcript button.

        But once you’ve found it, transcriptions are your best friend: skim it to see if there’s any real reason to watch (usually not) and enjoy that portion of your life that you just saved for things that YOU want and not what Google and that content creator want. The transcript will also tell you what portion of the video you need to watch, if actually watching it suits your needs.

        I also regularly speed up videos; 1.25 is great under most circumstances, 1.5 if they’re really trying to draaaag shit out. You can always slow it down again, but it’s great for getting through the fluff if you need to hear it all (like repair videos for something you’ve never done yourself).

      • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Plus it’s always a video, but never actually uses the medium. It’s just shots of the host talking to the camera. Very very rarely showing clips or screenshots that could even better be embedded in an article.

        Can you do a lot with a video, if done well and for the right subject? Of course, and for those it’d absolutely be the correct choice. But people like the guy linked in the OP are neither capable of nor interested in doing that, as it’s just a business to them. It increases income, so long youtube videos it is. That’s one big takeaway anyways: Content creators talk about this shit not because they care, but because it gives them money. It’s a business, not a passion.

        • AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Making a proper video takes a lot of time. Just recording yourself reading a text while taking cool poses, not so much.

    • Asafum@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      The “best” you could do in this case is use ad blockers, don’t use an account and never interact. Even a negative interaction counts. It’s all “engagement,” even if negative.

      • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        I installed a Channel Blocker and got into the practice of opening unknown videos in Private Windows. For some fucking reason, YT seems to think I want to hear about people complaining about being suppressed by the algorithm. I would leave nasty comments for those videos if not for the fact that, like you said, any interaction counts as “engagement”.

  • Captain Poofter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Has anyone here noticed how it’s almost impossible to watch a TikTok on mobile if you don’t have an account or the app? My friend sends me links and I click it but the website opens playing it muted and it only plays the TikTok one time, no repeating. Then it prompts me to install the app. If I say I don’t want to the unmute button disappears and I’m unable to play the TikTok again with sound. The only way to do it is to refresh which just prompts me to download the app again after being played the TikTok one time with no sound. Aggravating as all hell.

    • ERPAdvocate@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’ve been searching for a solution to this exact problem. My partner sends links occasionally and I always ignore because of how the web interface is blatantly hostile. Tried routing the links through MPV on android but no dice.

      If anyone has a solution please share.

        • HiramFromTheChi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Don’t worry, it’s not complicated at all. A little inconvenient maybe, but that’s always the trade-off when it comes to privacy and security.

          Here are the two most convenient ways that I can think of on each OS.

          iOS: Bookmark the frontend URL. When you get sent a link, pop open the page and paste the TikTok URL.

          Android: Get Firefox and set it as your default browser. Install the LibRedirect add-on (browser extension). Whenever you get sent a URL, just tap it and it’ll automatically get redirected to the privacy-friendly frontend.

      • EdibleFriend@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I hate tik tok but I also have actual friends and I am not gonna be a dick to them about what link they sent me

  • melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    if you didn’t steal it, you dont own it. fuck these companies.

    until more people take that attitude; problem only gets worse.

    • Stoney_Logica1@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I was pushed upselling offers no fewer than ten times over the two evenings I spent in their service prepping my taxes last week. It was infuriating. I’m going to try the IRS’s pilot program next year assuming it’s still available for the 2024 tax season.

  • Bosht@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Yes. This is pretty fucking apparent but again, cant do shit about it because corps have paid off our politicians and we can do fuck all about it because we have no way to properly revolt lest we all risk bankruptcy and lose everything.

    • HenriVolney@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      The EU doesn’t let big corps bully their citizen with monopolies, maybe you could try to implement some of their policies at hime

        • Ekky@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          To expand a little:

          While it indeed is annoying, it did mostly go as expected, as in, law makers must always be ready for companies responding to new and more restrictive laws with malicious compliance.

          The vast majority of websites don’t actually follow the rules for cookie banners or implement them in as roundabout a way as possible, making them needlessly annoying as it should always be easier and at least as fast to decline than to accept.

          While this all sounds like cookie banners ultimately are a failure because of the misimplementations that companies provided in response, it does function as an eye opener for the common man and stepping stone for the EU for further laws and fines in regard to citizens’ rights to privacy.

  • postmateDumbass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Corporations were allowed to incorporate in the public’s best interest. If they are no longer operating as such they should be dissolved.

    • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      What does the fact that it was expensive original have to do with it? He used to pay 120 and now it’s over 350. Those are two entirely different levels of expensive.

  • andrew@lemmy.stuart.fun
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Free money has dried up, so competition is drying up a bit too. And without free money, the big guys are feeling some squeeze and now want to extract the rent they always planned to eventually extract.

    • I_Fart_Glitter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Why do I have to tell my computer several time per week that I do not wish to let the X box app make changes to my computer?? I’ve never had anything to do with an X box. Oh, now you’re going to make my computer unusably slow unless I update and… what’s that… ? I can’t fucking update unless I ALLOW X BOX APP TO MAKE CHANGES TO MY COMPUTER??? Fuck you windows 11.

  • Balder@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    This is actually good. There’s finally more room for good services offered by smaller companies that care about users.

    • henfredemars@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      This would require the possibility of competition, which is generally forbidden widely due to lobbying, the consequential weakening of antitrust laws, and the follow-on massive consolidation on a scale that history has never seen before.

      Maybe in theory but not in 2024. You’re only allowed to compete until you moon a giant, then you’re screwed.

      • affiliate@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        this reminds me of what happened to the instagram cofounders when zuckerberg asked to buy their company:

        Systrom [cofounder] said he feared turning down an acquisition offer from Facebook would send Zuckerberg into “destroy mode” — a concern that Cohler [early investor] affirmed.

        (source)

        this stuff came up in a court hearing, and then nothing happened about it

        • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Antitrust laws and lobbying exist in many countries. You know there are more countries than just the U.S., right?

        • henfredemars@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          There’s this thing called multinational corporations that transcend the boundaries of a country. It varies, but this is a global problem. See issues like housing and the cost of food.

    • SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I moved to a smaller company for certain services. Now that small company gets bought up by a big company and the services are discontinued. Back to big tech it is.