• ascense@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    A corporation running a nuclear reactor to train AIs might just be the most cyberpunk news headline I’ve ever seen.

      • Abnorc@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        “What operating system is that running?”

        “Uh… vista.”

        “We’re all going to die!”

  • qaz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Better than coal or oil, it might even result in more R&D into reactor designs.

  • negativeyoda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I thought this crazy energy consumption shit would cool off a bit after assholes stopped bitcoin mining.

    Glad AI stepped up so we can generate bad art and prose while buttfucking the planet

    • El Barto@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      The planet will be alright. It will be lush green in a few million years when humans no longer exist.

      The current ecosystem, though… yeah. Buttfucked.

      • AfricanExpansionist@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Humans will exist. We will live in the sea and we will have flippers. Our brains will be smaller, but we will eat lots of fish.

    • PlexSheep@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      They could just invest in a solar farm or something, they are just a lot more economical.

      Nuclear is okay, but the costs compared to renewables are very high, and you have to put a lot of effort and security into building a reactor, compared to a solar panel that you can basically just put up and replace if it snaps.

      You probably know this discussion already through.

      Edit: Glad to see a nice instance of the discussion going here.

      • jackpot@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        are you arguing solar is more economical than nucleae cause if so youre wrong by a longshot