• ChocoboRocket@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Americans actually do shoot quite well, but the rules around gun handling are incredibly strict for Olympic shooting.

    Things like minor celebrations, emotion, or even the cadence of your walk while leaving the range can cause disqualification.

    Since American shooters can’t hit a bullseye without shotgunning a beer and magdumping into the sky as eagles carry exploding fireworks in celebration, they often do not place in Olympic shooting

    • ameancow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Or in other words, what’s missing from our country’s gun use is respect.

      The vast majority of our issues with gun violence is the fact that we disrespect guns almost as much as each other, they’re just another crass tool for achieving a feeling, like power, masculinity, reassurance and comfort. So then guess what happens when you flood the streets with more guns than every other developed nation combined?

      We are a nation of undisciplined shooters, they may shoot “quite well” in some cases, but for every shooter who does quite well at hitting a target you have several thousand who have no idea how to shoot, AND have no clue about gun safety, respect and responsible ownership.

      • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        smells like the gymnastics problem to me, incredibly strict ruling and doing things “too dangerous” will get points knocked off to me.

        You certainly don’t need to a fucking psychopath to shoot guns respectfully, but you also shouldn’t be deranged either.

      • Machinist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Respect is a big part of it. Another problem is that they aren’t seen as actual tools. They’re probably more often a male enhancement device than a tool.

        They should be viewed as a tool for the production of meat, for the efficient removal of varmints. In the worst case they are a tool for the defense of self or others. That worst case scenario is actually very rare.

        Tools and toys can be interchangeable. However: some pretty strict laws govern the use of toys like sports cars.

        My shooting tools are mostly polymer stocked or gripped. Plain, cheapest base model I can get. Then I take them apart and work on the mechanisms to make them mine. I don’t have a lot of them, just have a few for my particular use cases.

        I really like them. I get pleasure from using my tools. I also really like my lathe and my daily driver small truck. I’ve also taken them apart and worked on them.

        I think this attitude should be required if one is going to own and be responsible for such a dangerous tool. There should be an interview process or something to weed out dumb fucks and the mentally unstable. After all, the militia was supposed to be well regulated. It’s not particularly complicated.

        • ameancow@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          They’re probably more often a male enhancement device than a tool.

          Exactly what I’m saying, and people hate hearing it, because guns are fun and if you tell people to have less fun with something they fucking want to rip your head off, especially as we enter an age of desocialization.

          Desocialization is gonna be our really big problem, because while unstable backwoods hicks and suburban commando-wannabes are thoroughly worrying when they go out in the open, but they’re mostly harmless, they have social groups, they talk to others, they have range clubs, even “militia” groups that I’ve known are just chubby dads who want an excuse to camp in the desert and bring a cooler of beer.

          Nah, where we really need to be concerned is the growing mass of people who cling to guns like pacifiers AND live in social isolation bubbles, spending all their time on social media and chat groups that only reinforce their beliefs, getting locked into weirder and weirder interpretations of reality, losing the line between reality and fantasy.

          You saw this starting in earnest as far back as the Charlottesville “Unite The Right” white nationalist rally where one protester was murdered. There were, along the “hardened” white supremacists were no small number of kids. White, pasty, tubby kids who spend all their time on 4chan or in deeply unhinged areas of the internet. There are some famous clips of these kids, some crying on the curb after being pepper-sprayed, saying “This was supposed to be like a game!” as they sobbed.

          If you notice, we’ve only had a dramatic uptick in mass-shootings since, and I firmly believe social isolation is breaking people. Most of the shooters we see now fit that bill, everyone is looking for patterns, but the only one I see is these are people with no friends, no social lives, infatuations with guns, and read fucked up nonsense on the internet until they believe it.

          • Machinist@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            Yup. You get it. The solution is simple, with one exception. Simple doesn’t mean easy.

            We need socialized healthcare including mental healthcare. That would do a lot, there are almost always signs that a non-gang mass shooter is mentally unwell.

            Gang and crime based mass shootings would fall through the floor if we removed the incentive for them, prohibition of drugs. Addiction should be treated as a health problem.

            We need to identify these sources of hateful propaganda, the nests of poisonous ideology and root them out through education. We aren’t teaching critical thinking, I think that also has a lot to do with it.

            You also have many young men that lack good role models for positive masculinity. This is a big thing I’m not sure how to fix. Toxic masculinity has become so pervasive and has infected almost every straight man that can be considered macho. I’m a very masculine man, and proud of it. My zippo says Daddy. My straw hat also has a pride/equality pin next to a Ruger pin. The number of men that I meet like myself is quite low. Met a very macho trans man once that I found had a similar worldview. Have met similar men in the gay leather communities but they tend to cluster in large cities and form insular communities for their own safety.

            • ameancow@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              The number of men that I meet like myself is quite low

              You’ve met at least one here, I was raised by nutcases out in the boonies, raised deeply conservative and religious, did a sharp 180 when I got out on my own/escaped, and have now settled into an ideology that’s really all about harm reduction, personal freedom and kindness to one another, something that is completely at odds with how most men see masculinity right now.

              I have walked in both worlds, I get it, I get how so many people can feel so afraid and so ready to withdraw from the system and fight anyone who would take away their comforts. I get how so many young men are so lonely, traumatized and insecure. I get how so many women can’t trust men and end up making the problems worse as a result. I get how so many people are tuned-out from politics and social discourse and what this is doing to the world.

              The causes of all this are many, but they all highlight a massive failing in the human experience, we are a cursed creature who are stuck on the rails of biology and evolution, we think we have far more free-will than we really do, we think we’re somehow logical and rational, but we can’t even see the actual universe around us, if there even is one. We are trying to fit a ridiculously complicated world into our brains that were formed over ice ages and only really knows how to predict dangerous predators.

              And I don’t know which is worse anymore. Having awareness of all this, or being naive, blissful and ignorant. Neither gives peace, neither offers solutions, neither makes our lives better.

            • Kedly@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              On that last point I think part of the issue is positive masculinity needs to be tied with self love/empowerment. The focus on toxic masculinity has overall been negative and easily spun as “men are toxic” (even though the people who’d benefit most from positive masculinity would be men themselves). Men are struggling because its hard to find a way forward that society accepts and supports

              • Machinist@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 month ago

                Yeah. I have no clue how the path out of it works.

                Lots of disenfranchised young men full of anger and drives, piss and vinegar, see negative messaging for liking the stereotypical things that young straight men like on one side. On the other side they’re welcomed with open arms and then drip fed poison while reinforcing their identity.

                Here on Lemmy if you talk about hunting, meat eating, etc.; people get all riled up. Think I have at least one troll following me and down voting every post.

                The left is failing young men and driving them into the open arms of fascism.

                I have no clue what can be done about it.

                • Kedly@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  Yeah, I agree with you on pretty much all points. All I can really do is see my peers or juniors who may be at risk of falling into the darker corners, and try and bring them into my circle before that happens, but I only have so much time and energy, and that only helps the ones who get seen before they fall

      • xantoxis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Well, sure, but you don’t send a random selection of citizens to the Olympics. You send the best.

        The nation with the most gun owners per capita and a huge population should have many pinnacle-tier shooters, even if it also has many bad ones. So the question is, why aren’t they at the Olympics?

        • TexasDrunk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Honestly? Opportunity. It starts with money, or willingness for you or your parents to give up everything that isn’t training.

          I was in the service with some incredible shots. I’ve been on the range with some pretty incredible shots. Most of them would never have the opportunity for any number of reasons.

          Some of that comes down to simply money. Flavor Flav is sponsoring our women’s water polo team because some of them were working three jobs while training to stay afloat. Not everyone wants to or even can do that.

        • wanderingmagus@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          A lot of the people who would be excellent at shooting have no interest in specifically Olympic shooting or training for the type of shooting required, unfortunately. That, and the military has probably poached the best of the best, and don’t want to show what “best of the best” shooting looks like for strategic reasons.

          (side note, happy cake day!)

    • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      yeah i was gonna ask, do we even have a team that runs for this? I feel like we would’ve heard about it otherwise, yknow, being american and all that.

    • MCHEVA@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      The Olympic venue is probably intimidating when you’re used to using schools as shooting ranges.

  • chemicalprophet@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    They need to pack the targets in bunches of 20-25 and house them at an elementary school if you want these mouthbreathers to show interest😉

  • psycho_driver@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Don’t worry. They just wrapped up the Presidential Candidate leg of the competition. School is up next and we’re expected to have a strong showing.

  • skeezix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Im stick in a mental möbius thinking about the title of this post.

    If we don’t suck enough at sucking means we don’t really suck. But at the same time not sucking enough at sucking means we suck more.

    • ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Don’t be rude.

      The venue could also be a populated street, a supermarket, or a playground. Our mass shootings aren’t just limited to helpless school children.

  • EatATaco@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Isn’t it kind of weird to point at medal counts in the Olympics to say that America sucks? Most overall medals and second in gold medals. Shitting on America, no matter if it makes sense or not.

    • Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Bit of a woosh. It’s a joke about the specific category. America, the country with the largest number of shooting deaths, has 0 medals in the shooting category.

      • RaoulDook@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        America is not the country with the highest number of shooting deaths, nor is it the country with the highest per-capita number of shooting deaths. You have been misinformed by propaganda.

            • Hammocks4All@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              Brazil has a lot of gun deaths. But it’s worth keeping in mind that lots of the Amazon region is essentially a lawless “Wild West” and that specialized police units are, in fact, in war with enormous trafficking gangs. “Regular people” get shot too, of course, in violent crime incidents. But besides this, many “regular people” don’t own guns and don’t advocate for guns in the same way as in the US. There’s not really a “gun culture” that regular people participate in — it’s not an identity. Certainly not as much as the US.

              I think that’s what makes the photo a valid joke and criticism of the US and that it wouldn’t work for other countries like Brazil. It’s not just looking at total gun deaths or other absolute metrics, it’s also taking into account the layers that make guns in the US a cultural symbol. The US is basically the “gun country” of the world because in the US, guns aren’t just a gang or criminal thing, they’re a “regular” thing.

      • EatATaco@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I get the joke, it’s ironic. Which should have been the title. Just like it’s ironic to point to medal counts as evidence that America sucks.

        But it’s Lemmy and you get extra points for shitting on America, regardless of how much sense it makes.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Their averages are still fucked.

      American police officers will spend 43 rounds on a single eight year old jaywalker while the average Japanese assassin requires less than three rounds per Prime Minister.

      • uis@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        *47 rounds

        While the one Japanese assassin requires one round per 47 Prime Ministers.

  • PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    American shooting is a lot more flash than precision.

    Legitimately there’s a category of shooting sports that’s about the most efficient use of WWI trenchgun style slam firing, which is basically abusing the reload speed on that class of shotgun to convert it into a semi-auto.

    We literally made a sport out of what the enemy tried to get classed as a war crime as an act of spite and you’re wondering why we not so good at traditional marksmanship? It’s a level of decorum that America was basically founded as a fuck you against.

    • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I mean, the Olympic version of traditional marksmanship is using a lightweight pellet gun that can’t be holstered with a $5,000 customized hand grip and little eyeglass oculars.

      You make the competition with a glock 22 and allow 5 seconds to empty the clip and it’s a different competition.